Recently researchers have been engulfed by countless e-mail invitations to attend various scientific conferences. Participating in a scientific conference is one of many ways for the researcher to seek visibility and recognition in the academic society, so it’s no wonder that scientists are interested in these offers. However, they need to be careful – most of such invitations are the lure of predatory conference organizers.

Read more ...

On April 20th (Saturday) VU Central Library will be open until 4 pm., the Scholarly Communication and Information Centre (SCIC)  — until 9 pm.

On April 21st-22nd VU Central Library and SCIC will be closed — Easter

On April 23rd (Tuesday) VU Central Library and SCIC will open at 9 am.

Read more ...

On February 15th (Friday) VU Central Library and the Scholarly Communication and Information Centre (SCIC) will be open until 9 pm.

On February 16th (Saturday) VU Central Library and SCIC will be closed — National celebration.

On February 17th (Sunday) SCIC will open at 9 am.

Research evaluation is now led by the data rather than by judgement. Metrics have proliferated: usually well intentioned, not always well informed, often ill applied. There is the risk to damage the system with the tools designed to improve it, as evaluation is increasingly implemented by organizations without knowledge of, or advice on, good practice and interpretation.

To support researchers, a team of five experts, led by Diana Hicks, the professor of political science at the University of Georgia and Paul Wouters, the director of Science and Technology Studies Center of Leiden University presented  the Leiden manifesto, where proposed  a set of guiding principles on the use of quantitative metrics in research assessment.

The ten principles of the Leiden Manifesto:

  1. Quantitative evaluation should support qualitative, expert assessment
  2. Measure performance against the research missions of the institution, group or researcher,
  3. Protect excellence in locally relevant research
  4. Keep data collection and analytical processes open, transparent and simple
  5. Allow those evaluated to verify data and analysis
  6. Account for variation by field in publication and citation practices
  7. Base assessment of individual researchers on a qualitative judgement of their portfolio.
  8. Avoid misplaced concreteness and false precision
  9. Recognise the systemic effects of assessment and indicators
  10. Scrutinize indicators regularly and update them.

Read more about Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics

Prepared by the Scientific Information Data Department (SIDD).

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies. More information